Vygo Blog

The First 6 Weeks That Matter Most: Where Continuation Is Won or Lost

Written by Gaurav Deva | Feb 12, 2026 7:54:48 AM

For many students, the decision to continue at university is not made at the point of withdrawal.

It is often quiet in the first six weeks.

This early period is when uncertainty is highest, routines are unformed, and small barriers can quickly compound. Increasingly, engagement data is showing that continuation outcomes are strongly influenced not by what happens later in the year, but by how effectively students are supported during this initial transition.

Across UK institutions, the strongest first-year strategies are those that treat the first six weeks not as an orientation phase, but as a critical continuation window.

Transition pressure peaks early before formal risk appears.

In the early weeks of term, students are navigating multiple transitions at once:

  • Academic expectations and assessment standards.
  • New social environments.
  • Unfamiliar systems, platforms, and processes.
  • Practical and logistical challenges.

While most students will not formally signal risk during this period, engagement patterns tell a different story. Questions around “what do I do next?”, “Where do I find X?”, and “am I doing this right?” dominate early interactions, particularly in peer-led environments.

Data across Vygo-supported programmes consistently shows that early engagement themes are strongly linked to confidence, belonging, and stabilisation, all of which precede continuation outcomes.

Early connection reduces uncertainty before it escalates

One of the clearest predictors of early stabilisation is whether students form meaningful connections quickly.

At Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), where the university delivers its largest buddy scheme and a targeted social support programme using Vygo, over 80% of first year students were connected with a mentor within their first week.

In Term 1, 77% of all connections occurred during that first week, reducing uncertainty at the point when students are most likely to disengage silently.

A similar pattern is observed at Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU), where programmes delivered using Vygo see 80 to 88% of mentors actively engage, ensuring that most first year students receive early peer contact.

These early connections matter because they create a safe, informal space for students to ask questions they may not raise through formal channels, preventing small issues from becoming significant barriers later.

Belonging is built through repeated, low-friction interaction

Belonging does not emerge from one-off events. It develops through repeated, low effort interactions that help students feel recognised and supported.

Across institutions, early peer led connections frequently evolve into ongoing mentoring relationships, rather than ending after welcome or induction.

This continuity allows support to shift naturally as students’ needs change from social adjustment in the first weeks to academic and personal challenges later in the term.

Engagement data reinforces this:

  • At QMUL, 28% of engagement relates to belonging, including social integration and wellbeing support
  • At MMU, 23% of engagement reflects belonging, with students building rapport, reassurance, and social confidence

These interactions play a critical role in reducing isolation one of the most common drivers of early withdrawal.

Confidence emerges as the dominant early indicator

Across multiple institutions, student confidence consistently accounts for a large share of early engagement.

At MMU:

  • 45% of total engagement relates to improved levels for student confidence.
  • 32% of term 1 engagement focuses on navigating university systems, services, and practical logistics.

At QMUL:

  • 36% of engagement in term 1 also contributes to improved levels of student confidence.
  • Early interactions focus on moving students from confusion to clarity, from accessing resources to understanding expectations.

Confidence functions as a stabilising force during the first six weeks. When students understand how the university works and where to seek help, they are far less likely to disengage when academic or personal challenges arise.

Peer mentors absorb pressure at the point of highest demand

The first six weeks are also when demand for support peaks. Crucially, peer-led models absorb much of this demand without increasing pressure on professional services.

Highly engaged mentors, many of whom act as informal super mentors, play a central role by:

  • Resolving common academic and transitional questions
  • Providing reassurance and normalising uncertainty
  • Signposting students before escalation is required

Evidence of mentor participation is strong:

  • MMU: 88% of mentors engaged.
  • QMUL: 80% of mentors engaged.

This level of engagement ensures that most early concerns are addressed promptly, informally, and at low cost exactly when intervention is most effective.

Early engagement creates compounding benefits

Institutions that focus on the first six weeks are not just preventing early withdrawal. They are creating conditions for sustained engagement.

At the University of Greenwich, early support programmes have scaled from a single cohort (~500 users) to 14,000+ students across 11 programmes, without increasing programme management headcount.

In Term 1 (2025), 41% of engagement related to outcomes linked to continuation, demonstrating how early stabilisation supports longer-term persistence.

As students move through different programmes, welcome, academic mentoring, and career support, the risk of falling through gaps reduces significantly.